Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Colin W's avatar

Those 3rd down numbers are fascinating. I don't think the "ceiling touts" (for lack of a better term) will ever be satisfied with Jimmy, but you make a really compelling case.

Side note: as a Tannehill truther, his drop-off bums me out.

Expand full comment
Adam Steele's avatar

Though I mostly disagree, it’s quite refreshing to read a well researched article about Jimmy. The public discourse would be so much more tolerable if we could all rely on facts rather than narratives.

Why I disagree…the Niners have led the league in YAC per reception every year since 2018, and two of those seasons were primarily quarterbacked by CJ Beathard and Nick Mullens. From a Bayesian perspective, we can infer that Jimmy doesn’t have any special ability to help his receivers gain YAC. That’s important when so much of Jimmy’s EPA value is derived from YAC.

I do agree that Jimmy is objectively a very good QB on third down. But on this Niners team specifically, I question how much that really matters. Third down conversions are paramount for the Chiefs, for example, because their defense can’t stop a nosebleed and the offense only gets 8 or 9 drives per game. But that’s not the case in San Fran. With a dominant defense, the Niners offense can afford a few extra punts per game without a major hit to their likelihood of winning.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts